-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 484
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: handle SSE in copyObject() properly and have one source code. #777
fix: handle SSE in copyObject() properly and have one source code. #777
Conversation
7c2a2e4
to
8be1064
Compare
Build issue |
8be1064
to
4bbd323
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@balamurugana I see changes to getObject API. Can you please change the commit title and the message to reflect the changes ? It can be done in the PR title and description. I can use it while merging it. |
I believe Readme.md also should be updated |
Please resolve the conflicts @balamurugana |
Added new version of copyObject(). Note: this method makes source and destination argument swapping correctly to denote on which bucket and object the request is sent. ``` public void copyObject(String bucketName, String objectName, Map<String,String> headerMap, ServerSideEncryption sse, String srcBucketName, String srcObjectName, ServerSideEncryption srcSse, CopyConditions copyConditions) ```
4bbd323
to
d1273e1
Compare
ping @aead @sinhaashish |
ping @sinhaashish |
1 similar comment
ping @sinhaashish |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Added new version of copyObject(). Note: this method makes source and
destination argument swapping correctly to denote on which bucket and
object the request is sent.